Classical general relativity (GRT) – well proven and also incomplete

Klassische Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie – gut bestätigt, aber unvollständig

 

This website has two aims:

1.) Provide evidence of incompleteness of classical GRT. Two pages suffice. See GRT - well proven and also incomplete?“ or in German „Ist die Klassische Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie unvollständig?“. Later, refined versions you will find in: Talks_Brandes_since_2014

2.) Provide evidence that these considerations become slandered. See Einwand-Diffamierung-2012 as well as Further_Counterarguments_since_2013.

Since 2016 there are two additional aims:

3.) Presentation of a review by Dr. habil. Ludwig Neidhart being helpful for your decision of whether my website has enough scientific background:

                                                               Rezension-Ludwig-Neidhart.pdf

                                                               Review-Ludwig-Neidhart.pdf

4.) More about our book and additional ideas.

5th edition since 1.1.2022: J. Brandes, J. Czerniawski, L. Neidhart: Spezielle und Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie für Physiker und Philosophen - Einstein- und Lorentz-Interpretation, Paradoxien, Raum und Zeit, Experimente, 2022 Karlsbad: VRI, 5. erweiterte Auflage, 394 Seiten, über 100 Abbil­dungen, ISBN 978-3-930879-10-6. Näheres www.buchhandel.de oder www.amazon.de

Since the publication of our book several additional ideas different from 1.) arose. They also became part of Talks_Brandes_since_2014. The latest ones you find in:

Observations questioning classical GRT and preferring LI of GRT – EHT image of M87*, Spin, ALMA image of SGR A* and more. Chapter11 - 13 EHT image of Sgr A* from 12.5.2022 and LI of GRT and

Poster-DPG-2021-SL-nicht-bestätigt or Talk-DPG-2022-BH-not-confirmed

 

Some additional information: This website prefers Lorentz interpretation of SRT and GRT. Certainly, there is no difference with the experimental results of classical GRT including gravitational waves but the great exception: Lorentz interpretation of GRT predicts that there are no black holes in the galactic centers. Excitingly, this is going to be tested by the Event-Horizon-Telescope collaboration with first results since April 2019. The main result – image of Sgr A* – was released at 12.5.2022 and becomes discussed: see 4.) above.
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020 to Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez "for the discovery of a supermassive compact object at the centre of our galaxy" is fully satisfied by LI of GRT - as it should.

 

Keywords:

Classical GRT, Lorentz interpretation of GRT (LI of GRT)

Klassische Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, Lorentz-Interpretation der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie

 

Table of content:

Talk 2012:  „Ist die Klassische Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie unvollständig?“

Talk 2013: „GRT - well proven and also incomplete?”

Talks about LI of GRT since 2014: Talks_Brandes_since_2014

Slandering LI of GRT, counterarguments 2012: Einwand-Diffamierung-2012

Slandering LI of GRT, counterarguments since 2013: Further_Counterarguments_since_2013

 

Kontakt, Impressum

Jürgen Brandes, Dipl.-Phys.                                                                               erstellt:     27.4.2013

Danziger Str. 65                                                                                                 geändert:     6.9.2022

76307 Karlsbad

E-Mail: jg-brandes (at) web.de